For job interviews, pay talks and
hard conversations

Retry the momentthat matters.

The interview question that throws you. The moment your manager says no. Luwy plays the other person, pushes back like they would, shows you the exact answer that lost them, and lets you rewind and say it again. Out loud, until it comes out right.

1,300+ real scenesNo account for the testNo card to sign up

New accounts get 7 days with everything open. Then you pick a plan.
Free is one of them and never charges. See the plans.

JOB INTERVIEWEXAMPLE
Hiring manager
“Why should we pick you over the other finalists?”
Umm, I think I'm a good fit because I work hard.
Clarity42
Credibility38
Persuasion18
Add one concrete example and a reason to choose you. Try again?
Sound familiar?

You know what you want to say.Then the moment arrives.

“My mind goes blank when they ask something I didn't prepare for.”

Luwy puts you on the spot with questions you haven’t rehearsed.
You get a few seconds to think, then answer out loud.

“I only think of the right
answer afterwards.”

Luwy pinpoints the answer that changed the conversation.
You can go back and try again while it still matters.

“When they push back, I give in
or ramble.”

Practise handling doubt, interruptions and time pressure so you can hold your point without getting defensive.

“I practise, but I can’t tell if
I’m getting better.”

Your feedback points to what you actually said. A skill only counts when you can use it in a fresh scene, without hints.

See every hard moment and what trains it

What makes it different

Most practice ends with a score.Luwy gives you a second try.

You usually think of the right answer on the way home. Luwy lets you try it while the conversation is still in front of you. Rewind the moment, say it differently, and see how the same person responds.

First tryExample
Hiring manager
“Why should we pick you over the other finalists?”
Umm, I think I'm a good fit because I work hard.
Clarity42
Specificity29
Add one specific result so they can see what you bring.
Second tryExample
Hiring manager
“Why should we pick you over the other finalists?”
Two reasons. I cut our weekly report from three days to one by automating the data pull. And when client feedback lands on a Friday, I have it fixed by Monday. I'd bring both here.
Clarity81
Specificity81
Better. A real example, then a clear close.

An illustration. In your own run, every note quotes what you actually said.

It argues back

The interviewer asks the follow-up you didn’t prepare for.
The customer doesn’t accept your first apology. Each scene responds to how you handle the pressure, so you can practise staying clear when the conversation gets difficult.

Feedback you can act on

No vague advice to “sound more confident.” You see a clearer version of what you said and can hear how a stronger answer could sound.

A second chance at the moment

Go back to the turning point, answer again, and watch the same person respond differently. Both tries sit side by side.

Proof that it stuck

“Prove it” puts you in a new scene without hints. You earn the skill when you can use it on your own.

How it works

Pick it. Say it.Fix the weak bit.Prove it.

Pick the conversation you're dreading

Choose a job interview, ask for a raise, handle a refund—or practise a conversation you’re facing right now.

Talk it through out loud

The other person has their own goal and pushes back. Speak, or type if you're somewhere quiet.

Fix the weak moment

Luwy highlights the part of your answer that weakened your point. Rewind, try again, and compare the two.

Prove it in a new scene

No hints this time. Pass it and the skill is yours.

Start with a conversation you actually need to have.

Why not just rehearse in the mirror?

The other person is what throws you.Practise with someone who pushes back.

What you getMirror or notesA friendA general AI chatLuwy
Someone who pushes backNoIf they're willingOnly if askedEvery scene
Shows the exact answer that hurt youNoSometimesRarelyQuoted, with a fix
Lets you redo that one momentNoAwkward to askYou start overRewind and retry
Measures pace, fillers and pauses
from your voice
NoNoNoYes
Scores what you really said,
every “um” included
NoRarelyNoFrom your recording
Shows whether you're improvingNoNoNoSkills you prove
Free at 11pm the night beforeYesDepends on the friendYesYes
Honest scoring

Know which numbers are measuredand which are judgement.

Measured from your voice

Pace, fillers, pauses

Words per minute, every “um” and “uh,” and how long you went quiet. If you type instead, Luwy tells you that delivery wasn’t measured—it never guesses.

Judged from your words

Clarity, structure, fit

Did you answer what was asked, in an order that's easy to follow, in the right tone for that person? Each score comes with the quote it's based on.

Estimated inside the scene

How the other person is taking it

The meters offer a rough idea of how the character might react. Use them to practise reading the room, not as a prediction of what a real person thinks.

The research

Why these methods, and what the studies really found.

Our methods draw on published studies. Here’s what the research found.
None of these studies tested Luwy itself, so the research supports the methods—not a claim that Luwy has been proven to work. Read the limits.

Show the research behind each feature
FeatureWhat it doesData it rests onAll figures
Pressure EscalatorInterruptions, time limits, curveballs and hard personalities that rise as you cope.
  • 1,837 people. Stress inoculation training reduced performance anxiety and improved performance under stress. Saunders et al. (1996)
  • About as good as real practice. Graded practice in a simulated social setting helped people with social anxiety about as much as practising in real situations. Chesham et al. (2018)
See the studies and limits
Audience modeA room of two to five people. You must answer each one, and Luwy scores whether you did.
  • 40 speakers. A hostile virtual audience made speakers anxious, including speakers who normally felt confident. Pertaub et al. (2002)
See the studies and limits
Read the roomPick the best reply to a short scene and see why it works.
  • Worked in every area. In a meta-analysis, training improved how accurately adults read other people, and the size of the effect depended on the skill trained. Blanch-Hartigan et al. (2012)
  • 215 studies. People who read others more accurately tend to function better socially, including in some work-related skills. Hall et al. (2009)
See the studies and limits
Retry and Prove itRewind to the answer that cost you, say it again, then pass a fresh scene with no hints.
  • 61% vs 40%. One week later, students who practised by recalling remembered far more than students who only re-studied. Roediger & Karpicke (2006)
  • 61 studies. Testing beat restudying across the literature, and adding feedback nearly doubled the benefit. Rowland (2014)
See the studies and limits
Fix a weak spotA short drill for the exact habit your last run showed, then back to Prove it.
  • 14 studies. In 14 studies, simulation-based training with deliberate practice beat traditional clinical education. McGaghie et al. (2011)
  • 196 studies. Feedback is among the strongest influences on learning, but its effect depends on type: task and process feedback helps, praise alone does little. Hattie & Timperley (2007)
See the studies and limits
Next-step planEach result ends with one specific if-then move to carry into your next conversation.
  • 94 tests. Making a specific 'if this happens, I will do that' plan improved goal attainment across 94 tests. Gollwitzer & Sheeran (2006)
See the studies and limits
Transfer challenge and daily drillsThe same skill in a different setting, spread over days instead of one session.
  • 317 experiments. Spreading practice out improves retention, and the best gap grows with how long you need to remember. Cepeda et al. (2006)
  • Mixed beat one-at-a-time. Mixing different problem types beat practising one type at a time. Brunmair & Richter (2019)
See the studies and limits
Register and code-switchingChecks whether your words suit the listener: local mix-ins such as lah, kan or aiyo, and formal or casual wording.
  • 13 studies. Teaching pragmatics explicitly worked better than not teaching it. Jeon & Kaya (2006)
  • 39 studies. Teaching L2 pragmatics and giving corrective feedback improved learners' pragmatic ability, and computer-based delivery did at least as well as face-to-face. Yousefi & Nassaji (2019)
See the studies and limits
Assertiveness and workplace skillsAssertiveness, empathy and influence scored with the rest of the benchmark.
  • 56 studies. Interpersonal-skills training in organisations was linked to a medium improvement in on-the-job behaviour. Arthur et al. (2003)
  • A review. The authors argue that assertiveness training has good evidence across many problems but has been under-researched and under-used. Speed et al. (2018)
See the studies and limits
Feedback inside the conversationPushback and a quoted review of your own words, not a generic grade.
  • 15 classroom studies. Corrective feedback in classrooms had a significant, lasting effect, and prompts beat recasts. Lyster & Saito (2010)
  • 16 studies. Dialogue systems improved second-language speaking, and goal-oriented systems did best. Hou & Min (2026)
See the studies and limits
Calm start and safe repetitionLow-stakes first runs, then more pressure. Resilience is counted only when you recover.See the studies and limits
Speak clearlyTongue-twister lines scored by the same pronunciation check as the Pronunciation tool.
  • 86 studies. Pronunciation instruction has a large average effect on second-language pronunciation, especially when it runs longer and includes feedback. Lee et al. (2015)
See the studies and limits
Interview practiceInterview scenes and the interview mission with follow-up questions.
  • 213 candidates. Candidates who chose to attend an interview coaching session scored higher in situational interviews, after controlling for job knowledge and motivation. Maurer et al. (2001)
  • 90 students. Students who practised interviews with an automated virtual coach were rated by human experts as improved; control groups were not. Hoque et al. (2013)
See the studies and limits

Knowing English and speaking clearly under pressure are different skills. Luwy helps you practise the second.

Before you start

What people usually ask first.

Can I practise when I can't speak out loud?

Speaking out loud helps Luwy assess your delivery as well as your words. If you're on a train or in a shared office, you can type your answer and still get feedback on the message itself.

What situations can I practise?

Prepare for job interviews, asking for a raise, responding to pushback, handling a difficult customer or answering tough presentation questions. You can also describe your own situation and build a practice scenario around it.

What feedback will I get?

Get a Luwy Score out of 100, an A–F grade and scores for fluency, grammar, vocabulary and structure. Luwy pinpoints the moment that weakened your answer, explains how to improve it and gives you a stronger response to try. Retry and compare versions to target the skill you need to build. With a usable recording, see your pace, pauses and filler words; typed answers are assessed on words alone.

What happens after my free trial?

The 60-second test is free and needs no account. Create an account to get 7 days of free trial access with every feature open—no card needed. After that, choose Free (3 full conversations a month, never charged), Starter at RM14.90/month or Pro at RM34.90/month.

Get it wrong here.Get it right when it counts.

Speak for 60 seconds and get a Luwy Score out of 100, an A–F grade, four skill scores—fluency, grammar, vocabulary and structure—your strongest skill, and your next improvement target.